Phantasmix Stock Blog

Fascinating video (4min 38sec) showing the effect of increased income on life expectancy worldwide over a period of 200 years. By Hans Rosling.

Full text @ Had Enough Therapy?

In days of yore, as Merkin testifies, women in certain communities were told to ignore money issues. If they showed an interest in money it had to mean either that that they did not want to be taken care of, or that they were not confident that men could do so.

A woman’s interest in money would have threatened the male role of provider, and would have made her a less attractive mate.

And it is probably true, even at a time when most women work outside the home,that many learn about financial issues only when they are forced to… by divorce, widowhood, or financial crisis…

…Women’s studies belongs to the humanities. They emphasize soft subjects, subjects that involve emotion and art, subjects that stereotypically exist within women’s domains.

Part of the problem is that feminism holds as dogma that reality is constructed out of power relations that seek to exploit women.

But, money is about numbers. And like it or not, numbers are real. They are not a social construct. If you have learned from critical theory and deconstruction that there are no facts, you will never develop a good relationship with money.

USA, 1981

Population – 229,466,000
Unemployment rate – 7.6%
Total unemployed – 17,439,416

USA, 2008

Population – 301,139,947 (July 2007 est.)
Unemployment rate – 6.1%
Total unemployed – 18,369,536

Lower unemployment rate, but more people actually unemployed.

The media reports that all mortgage defaults in the U.S. amount to approximately 1.5 or 2% of all outstanding mortgages. That doesn’t sound like much, so why is it a problem?

Banks’ leverage is 30 times – meaning that for every dollar they have, they can loan out $30. Therefore, if a bank uses its full capacity to give out loans, and then just 4% of all oustanding loans default, the bank will be wiped out. (If you have no cash on hand, how can you loan out anything?) The more loans/mortgages are in default, the less the bank can loan out, because it now has less money to leverage against.

And then it goes like this: less cash on hand -> less able to loan out -> less able to make money on the loan interest.

This is a simple explanation for the people like me, with only basic understanding of banks and credit. If I made a mistake here, please correct.

This is a re-post of an active commenter from The Big Picture blog.

“I believe there is serious misconception about what is occuring and what will occur. First and foremost, the threat forward going is not inflation or stagflation – it is deflation.

Although it is true that inflation has been understated, the cause of the inflation has been poorly analyzed. Compare M1 to M3 and you readily see that this is not monetized inflation but debt-expansion inflation.

Debt acts just like money to a point – and that point is insolvency. Debt will say that my CDO is worth $1.00, but insolvency shows that the market values my CDO at $0.27. What happened to the inflation within the CDO? It evaporated, as all mirage capital must eventually disappear.

Debt said my house was worth $500,000. Insolvency and debt contraction says it is worth $400,000 or less.

Debt said all those casinos being built in Las Vegas were worth millions, that New York office buildings could support negative cash flows, and that that copper was worth an all-time high.

False perspective can drive a false demand, leading to a bubble – a bubble being that portion of the price of an asset that is simply driven by debt – i.e., Ponzi fincance. Anyone remember 1973 and 1974 when we perceived an oil shortage when none had occured? Or when all those builders paid premium prices for undeveloped land because low interest rates had caused an artificial demand for housing?

Misallocation of assets. That is what has occured. The decoupling of the world is an illusion – serious recession in the U.S. would lead to world recession, and all those high-flying commodity prices would come tumbling down along with it.

Debt contraction is a deflationary event, and it is the threat of deflation that is propelling the Fed to slash rates – which they will continue to do until we reach a real negative interest rate.”

Posted by: Winston Munn | Jan 17, 2008 9:29:37 PM

Notice, it was written in January of this year. I’m not seeing much deflation yet, but maybe I’m looking in all the wrong places?